Bender et al 2012 The Savannah Hypothesis

Review and discuss existing papers.
Forum rules
A sample of papers are listed here as an example of the format suggested for future topics.

Bender et al 2012 The Savannah Hypothesis

Postby AlgisKuliukas » Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:09 pm

The Savannah Hypothesis: Origin, Reception and Impact on Paleoanthropology
Renato Bender, Phillip V Tobias, Nicole Bender.
Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 34 (2012), 147-184

Abstract
The reconstruction of the human past is a complex task characterized by a
high level of interdisciplinarity. How do scientists from different fields reach consensus on
crucial aspects of paleoanthropological research? The present paper explores this question
through an historical analysis of the origin, development, and reception of the savannah
hypotheses (SHs). We show that this model neglected to investigate crucial biological
aspects which appeared to be irrelevant in scenarios depicting early hominins evolving
in arid or semi-arid open plains. For instance, the exploitation of aquatic food resources
and other aspects of hominin interaction with water were largely ignored in classical
paleoanthropology. These topics became central to alternative ideas on human evolution
known as aquatic hypotheses. Since the aquatic model is commonly regarded as highly
controversial, its rejection led to a stigmatization of the whole spectrum of topics around
water use in non-human hominoids and hominins. We argue that this bias represents a
serious hindrance to a comprehensive reconstruction of the human past. Progress in this
field depends on clear differentiation between hypotheses proposed to contextualize early
hominin evolution in specific environmental settings and research topics which demand the
investigation of all relevant facets of early hominins’ interaction with complex landscapes.

Keywords - Human evolution, history of paleoanthropology, savannah hypothesis,
aquatic hypothesis, interdisciplinarity.
Waterside hypotheses of human evolution assert that selection from wading, swimming and diving and procurement of food from aquatic habitats have significantly affected the evolution of the lineage leading to Homo sapiens as distinct from that leading to Pan. (p118)
Kuliukas, A., Morgan, E. (2011). Aquatic scenarios in the thinking on human evolution: What are they and how do they compare?. In: Vaneechoutte, M., Verhaegen, M., Kuliukas, A. (2011). Was Man More Aquatic in the Past?
User avatar
AlgisKuliukas
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:24 pm

Re: Bender et al 2012 The Savannah Hypothesis

Postby cesium » Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:39 am

Where can one obtain a full copy of this article online?
cesium
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:37 am

Re: Bender et al 2012 The Savannah Hypothesis

Postby CEngelbrecht » Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:00 am

Please check your PM inbox.
User avatar
CEngelbrecht
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:10 pm
Location: Scania, Sweden


Return to Peer Reviewed Papers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest